Four Indicted in Clinton County Giant Buck Poaching Case

Photo of author

By Mike

A recent indictment in Clinton County, Ohio, has drawn significant attention to the practice of wildlife poaching.

At the heart of the matter is a case involving four individuals charged with the illegal harvest of an 18-point white-tailed deer, an event that has sent ripples through the local and broader hunting communities.

Among those indicted, Christopher J. Alexander stands accused of unlawfully taking the buck in question—an act that, if confirmed, could have severe implications under Ohio’s hunting regulations.

The matter came to light following an investigation by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), sparked by suspicions surrounding the legitimacy of the harvest.

The indictment has served as a catalyst for discussions on conservation, wildlife management, and hunters’ ethical responsibilities.

It raises critical questions about the balance between legal hunting practices and the urgent need to protect wildlife from illegal exploitation.

Key Takeaways

  • Four individuals have been indicted for the alleged illegal poaching of a prized deer in Clinton County.
  • The case underscores the enforcement of wildlife conservation laws and the consequences of poaching.
  • The incident has provoked dialogue on legal hunting ethics and protecting natural resources.

The Case of the Clinton County Buck

In an unprecedented indictment, four individuals have been charged in connection with the illegal harvest of a trophy white-tailed deer in Clinton County, Ohio.

Indictment Details

On May 10, 2024, a Clinton County grand jury indicted Christopher J. Alexander, a 28-year-old from Wilmington, Ohio, on several counts related to this case.

This indictment stemmed from the unlawful harvest of an 18-point buck on November 9, 2023. The buck, which has garnered significant attention due to its size, spotlighted the issue of poaching in Ohio.

Charges and Legal Proceedings


Christopher Alexander, 28, of Wilmington, faces 23 total charges:

• Five counts each of illegally hunting deer without written permission (M3) and taking possession of a deer in violation of a division rule (M3).

• Three counts of theft by deception (F4 and F5).

• Two counts each of hunting without a license (M4), hunting deer without a valid deer permit (M4) and tampering with evidence (F3)

• One count each of jacklighting (M3), theft (M1), falsification (M1) and sale of wildlife parts (M4).

Corey Haunert, 29, of Hillsboro, faces eight charges:

• Four counts of aiding a wildlife offender (M3).

• Two counts of hunting without written permission (M3).

• One count each of tampering with evidence (F3) and falsification (M1).

Kristina Alexander, 37, of Blanchester, faces one count of falsification (M1) and one count of aiding a wildlife offender (M3), and Zachary Haunert, 31, of Lebanon, faces two misdemeanor counts of aiding a wildlife offender (M3).”

Source: Ohio Attorney General’s Office, Press Release

Legal proceedings began shortly after the grand jury returned the indictment, with the Attorney General’s Office and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources collaborating to uphold the state’s wildlife conservation laws.

The charges against the individuals involved promise to bring justice in a high-profile case that has resonated with conservationists and the public alike.

Implications of Wildlife Poaching

When you consider the broader implications of wildlife poaching, two critical areas stand out: the impact on conservation efforts and the legal and ethical considerations.

These areas underscore the complexity of poaching beyond its immediate illegal act.

Conservation Efforts

Poaching significantly hinders conservation efforts aimed at maintaining ecological balance. For instance, the illegal harvesting of a trophy deer, like the one in Clinton County, Ohio, threatens the local deer population’s genetic diversity.

Each illegally taken animal could have played a role in maintaining a healthy, diverse gene pool. This loss can lead to several adverse effects, including:

  • A decrease in the robustness of the species.
  • Potential disruption in local ecosystems due to the removal of key individuals.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

From a legal standpoint, poaching violates wildlife regulations that are in place to protect natural resources. It can lead to substantial fines and legal consequences, as seen with the indictments in the Clinton County incident.

Ethically, poaching undermines the trust placed in hunters to follow stringent hunting norms and regulations, including:

  • Respect for hunting seasons and bag limits.
  • Adherence to the guidelines of lawful hunting practices.

Your actions as a part of the hunting community reflect on hunters as a whole and influence public perception and policy.

Community Response

Upon the indictment of Christopher J. Alexander for the alleged poaching, the community of Clinton County, Ohio, expressed mixed emotions.

You might have noticed an immediate impact on local hunting forums and social media, where discussions ignited concerning the ethical boundaries of hunting.

Local Hunters:

  • Disappointment: Many local hunters expressed disappointment due to the negative spotlight on the hunting community.
  • Concerns: Some shared concerns about the potential implications this incident might have on lawful hunting practices and conservation efforts.


  • Advocacy for Stricter Penalties: In efforts to protect wildlife, conservationists called for stricter penalties for poaching violations.
  • Awareness: They also emphasized the need for increased awareness regarding the importance of adherence to hunting regulations.

General Public: The broader Clinton County community, while perhaps less invested in the specifics of hunting ethics, seemed concerned about the rule of law and the preservation of local wildlife.

Local Authorities: Local law enforcement and officials from Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) likely faced heightened pressure to demonstrate the enforcement of regulations, reassuring the community that such incidents are taken seriously and handled appropriately.

Leave a Comment